Pluto LNG Terminal

This article is part of the Global Fossil Infrastructure Tracker, a project of Global Energy Monitor.

Sub-articles:

FrackSwarm portal Coal terminals Coal transport and infrastructure Oil and gas pipelines LNG terminals Pipeline construction costs Methodology and data notes

Pluto LNG Terminal is an LNG terminal in Western Australia, Australia.

Location

Loading map...

{"type":"SATELLITE","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","width":"400px","height":"300px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"visitedicon":"","wmsoverlay":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"cluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[],"searchmarkers":"","fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":"","lat":-20.6128,"lon":116.76556,"icon":""}]}

Project Details

Train 1

• Operator: Woodside Energy
• Owner: Woodside Energy [90%], MidOcean Energy [5%], Kansai Electric [5%] (Pluto Joint Venture)
• Parent company: Woodside Energy [90%], EIG Global Energy Partners [5%], Kansai Electric [5%]
• Operator: Woodside Energy
• Location: Perth, Burrup Peninsula, Western Australia, Australia
• Coordinates: -20.6128, 116.76556 (exact)
• Type: Export
• Capacity: 4.9 mtpa
• Cost: 12 billion USD
• Status: Operating
• Type: Export
• Start Year: 2012

Train 2

• Operator: Woodside Energy
• Owner: Woodside Burrup Train 2 A Pty Ltd [51%]; Global Infrastructure Partners [49%] (Pluto Train 2 Joint Venture)
• Parent company: Woodside Energy [51%], Global Infrastructure Partners [49%]
• Location: Perth, Burrup Peninsula, Western Australia, Australia
• Coordinates: -20.6128, 116.76556 (exact)
• Type: Export
• Capacity: 5.0 mtpa
• Status: Construction
• Start Year: 2026
• Cost: US$5.6 billion
• FID: 2021
• Associated infrastructure: Scarborough Gas Field (Western Australia, Australia)

Train 3

• Owner: Woodside Energy [90%], MidOcean Energy [5%], Kansai Electric [5%] (Pluto Joint Venture)
• Parent: Woodside Energy [90%], EIG Global Energy Partners [5%], Kansai Electric [5%]
• Location: Perth, Burrup Peninsula, Western Australia, Australia
• Coordinates: -20.6128, 116.76556 (exact)
• Type: Export
• Capacity: 4.3 mtpa
• Status: Cancelled
• Start Year:

Note: mtpa = million tonnes per year; bcfd = billion cubic feet per day

Background

Pluto LNG Terminal is an LNG terminal in Western Australia, Australia.

This facility is estimated to generate between 0.36 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) for every metric ton of LNG produced according to a 2013 report.

In 2015 The Guardian reported that Australia’s top 20 emitting facilities include the Wheatstone LNG Terminal, Gorgon LNG Terminal, Ichthys LNG Terminal, and Pluto LNG Terminal.

In 2017 Woodside, Australia's biggest oil and gas company, cancelled a small expansion of Pluto. Instead it developed plans to connect their smaller Pluto LNG Terminal with their North West Shelf LNG Terminal on the Burrup Peninsula.

As of 2017, Australia is the second largest LNG exporter after Qatar. The country exports almost 44 million tons a year.

In 2017 it was discovered that the petroleum resource rent tax had failed to collect billions of dollars in revenue north-west Australia. According to research at Monash University, Wheatstone LNG Terminal, Pluto LNG Terminal, and Ichthys LNG Terminal are not subect to commonwealth royalities.

In December 2022, Western Gas said it had partnered with participants of North West Shelf project and Woodside Energy's Pluto LNG plant to annually process up to 3 million tonnes of low carbon dioxide gas from the Equus gas project off Western Australia for LNG export from 2027.

In May 2023, Woodside investigated an incident at a flare tower which resulted in an "audible release." Australia’s Offshore Alliance said in a social media post that “Friday night’s explosion at Pluto was not simply an “audible release” as they’ve told employees and contractors...Woodside are lucky that no one was killed or seriously injured as the explosion shook the ground and surrounding crib huts."

In August 2023, Woodside agreed to sell 10% of the Scarborough Joint Venture to LNG Japan. This doesn't appear to affect ownership of the LNG terminal itself, but in the deal LNG Japan would take up to 1.7 mtpa of LNG from the deal.

In October 2022, LNGPrime reported that U.S.-based EIG's LNG unit MidOcean Energy had entered an agreement to purchase Tokyo Gas's share of four Australian LNG projects, including Pluto LNG Terminal. The deal was expected to close in the first half of 2023.

In March 2024, MidOcean Energy, the LNG unit of EIG, has completed its previously announced deal to buy Tokyo Gas's shares in the project.

In May 2024, it was reported that TechnipFMC had secured a subsea contract from Woodside worth up to $250 million to support ongoing production from Pluto LNG terminal.

Expansion projects

Train 2

A second train with 5-mtpa capacity has been proposed. In January 2019, Woodside announced that it planned to achieve a final investment decision (FID) by 2020 and commission the expansion in 2024. Later, the beginning of operations at the plant were pushed back until 2026.

In March 2020, Woodside announced that it was delaying the final investment decision for the expansion as part of a package of spending cutbacks (estimated at US$32 billion) it had been compelled to make owing to its plunging stock-market value brought about by turmoil in the oil and gas markets which has been exacerbated by the global coronavirus pandemic.

In November 2021, Woodside announced a final investment decision (FID) on the Scarborough gas field development and Pluto's Train 2, which would process Scarborough natural gas. In January 2022, Woodside completed the sale of a 49% non-operating participating interest to Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP) for the second train, for which the estimated capital expenditure is US$5.6 billion.

In August 2022, construction began on the second train. The engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractor for the project is Bechtel.

As of July 2023, construction of the second train and the Scarborough gas field were reportedly 38% complete.

In September 2023, Australia's federal court reversed regulatory approval for the offshore seismic survey that the Pluto project relied on to move forward for Train 2, implying a potential delay to the slated 2026 startup of Train 2.

In February 2024, the first three out of 51 modules were delivered to the construction site from the module yard in Indonesia. This marked a key milestone towards the delivery of the project. The remaining modules are expected to be delivered to the site throughout 2024. At this time, the project was reported to be more than 55% complete.

In April 2024, the first of three refrigeration compressor modules were delivered to the site.

In April 2024, the construction of the second train and the infrastructure at the Scarborough gas field were reportedly 62% complete.

Train 3

A proposal for a third train has been cancelled.

Environment

Bloomberg published an article in 2017 claiming the Wheatstone LNG Terminal is designed to let other producers use its equipment to liquefy their gas. Woodside is pursuing a similar strategy. It is courting energy giants like Exxon and Shell to let go of plans for new LNGs in favor of feeding gas into its Pluto LNG Terminal.

The Wheatstone and Woodside strategy of sharing facilities with competitors is likely a lesson from Curtis Island. The island's three plants in Australia (Australia Pacific LNG Terminal, Gladstone LNG Terminal, Queensland Curtis LNG Terminal) as an example of having exorbitant infrastructure duplication that it could have saved $10 billion on the combined $70 billion LNG projects. The three LNGs built separate jetties that now crowd the coastal land. Shared facilities, pipelines, and roads could have produced the same amount of fuel with less damage to the coast.

Opposition

In March 2020 protesters glued themselves to a banister in the Western Australia parliament and dropped leaflets opposing the Burrup LNG Hub on Ministers. "We're going to erode and efface their social license the way they're eroding and effacing the Murujuga rock art on the Burrup Peninsula," said one protestor.