Polk Power Station
Part of the Global Oil and Gas Plant Tracker, a Global Energy Monitor project. |
Related categories: |
Part of the Global Coal Plant Tracker, a Global Energy Monitor project. |
Related coal trackers: |
Polk Power Station is an operating power station of at least 1166-megawatts (MW) in Mulberry, Florida, United States with multiple units, some of which are not currently operating.
Location
Table 1: Project-level location details
Plant name | Location | Coordinates (WGS 84) |
---|---|---|
Polk Power Station | Mulberry, Florida, United States | 27.728611, -81.98972 (exact) |
The map below shows the exact location of the power station.
Unit-level coordinates (WGS 84):
- CC2, Unit 1: 27.728611, -81.98972
Project Details
Table 2: Unit-level details
Unit name | Status | Fuel(s) | Capacity (MW) | Technology | CHP | Start year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC2 | Operating[1] | fossil gas: natural gas, fossil liquids: diesel[1][2] | 1166[1] | combined cycle[1][2] | no[1] | 2017[1] |
Unit 1 | Mothballed | coal: unknown, fossil gas: natural gas, fossil liquids: fuel oil | 192.9 | IGCC | – | 1986 |
CHP is an abbreviation for Combined Heat and Power. It is a technology that produces electricity and thermal energy at high efficiencies. Coal units track this information in the Captive Use section when known.
Table 3: Unit-level ownership and operator details
Unit name | Owner | Parent |
---|---|---|
CC2 | Tampa Electric Co [100%] | Emera Inc [100.0%] |
Unit 1 | Tampa Electric Co [100%] | Emera Inc [100.0%] |
Demonstration plant
In 2010 TECO said it was partnering with RTI International and the Shaw Group to conduct a study on a technology to "clean" synthetic gas (syngas) of sulfur dioxide at elevated temperatures. The study will evaluate the construction of a pilot project to demonstrate the technology on a 30 percent side stream at the Polk IGCC plant.[3]
Gas-Fired Generation
The power station has an installed capacity of 1,492.5 MW[4] between two combined-cycle units. Unit 1 is a one-on-one dual-fuel combined cycle unit capable of burning natural gas or solid fuel through the IGCC process. According to the Tampa Electric's website, the company has placed the IGCC process in long-term reserve standby while utilizing natural gas as the most cost-effective fuel to produce power and reduce costs to their customers[5]. However, the unit is still listed as using the IGCC technology on the website of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection[6].
Unit 2 is a four-on-one natural gas combined cycle unit constructed in 2017 by converting four simple cycle combustion turbines into a modern, efficient combined cycle facility. Two of the four combustion turbines are dual fuel using natural gas and ULSD (Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel) oil[5].
Carbon Capture and Storage Project
In August 2022, the agency’s Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM) announced $31 million in funding for 10 CCS projects, including front-end engineering design (FEED) study completion for carbon capture systems at the Polk power station[7]. The project would add ION Clean Energy, Inc's CCS technology at the plant. It plans to capture at least 95% of CO2 emissions equating to nearly 3.7 tonnes per year to be stored in geological deposits[8].
Emissions Data
- 2006 CO2 Emissions: 1,927,882 tons
- 2006 SO2 Emissions:
- 2006 SO2 Emissions per MWh:
- 2006 NOx Emissions:
- 2005 Mercury Emissions:
Death and disease attributable to fine particle pollution from the Polk Power Station
In 2010, Abt Associates issued a study commissioned by the Clean Air Task Force, a nonprofit research and advocacy organization, quantifying the deaths and other health effects attributable to fine particle pollution from coal-fired power plants.[9] The study found that over 13,000 deaths and tens of thousands of cases of chronic bronchitis, acute bronchitis, asthma-related episodes and asthma-related emergency room visits, congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, dysrhythmia, ischemic heart disease, chronic lung disease, peneumonia each year are attributable to fine particle pollution from U.S. coal-fired power plants. Fine particle pollution is formed from a combination of soot, acid droplets, and heavy metals formed from sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and soot. Among those particles, the most dangerous are the smallest (smaller than 2.5 microns), which are so tiny that they can evade the lung's natural defenses, enter the bloodstream, and be transported to vital organs. Impacts are especially severe among the elderly, children, and those with respiratory disease. Low-income and minority populations are disproportionately impacted as well, due to the tendency of companies to avoid locating power plants upwind of affluent communities.
The table below estimates the death and illness attributable to the Polk Power Station. Abt assigned a value of $7,300,000 to each 2010 mortality, based on a range of government and private studies. Valuations of illnesses ranged from $52 for an asthma episode to $440,000 for a case of chronic bronchitis.[10]
Table 1: Death and disease attributable to fine particle pollution from the Polk Power Station
Type of Impact | Annual Incidence | Valuation |
---|---|---|
Deaths | 1 | $6,200,000 |
Heart attacks | 1 | $120,000 |
Asthma attacks | 11 | <$1,000 |
Hospital admissions | <1 | $15,000 |
Chronic bronchitis | <1 | $210,000 |
Asthma ER visits | 1 | <$1,000 |
Source: "Find Your Risk from Power Plant Pollution," Clean Air Task Force interactive table, accessed February 2011
Articles and Resources
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 https://web.archive.org/web/20230918190319/https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia860m/archive/xls/may_generator2023.xlsx. Archived from the original on 18 September 2023.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ↑ 2.0 2.1 https://web.archive.org/web/20221006212948/https://www.tampaelectric.com/company/ourpowersystem/powergeneration/polk/. Archived from the original on 06 October 2022.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|archive-date=
(help); Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ↑ "Tampa Electric to Participate in Two U.S. Department of Energy Funded Demonstration Projects Designed to Advance Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies," SunHerald.com, July 26, 2010.
- ↑ "Form EIA-860M". EIA. May 24, 2023. Retrieved May 31, 2023.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ 5.0 5.1 "Polk Power Station". TECO. Retrieved May 31, 2023.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ "Polk Power Station". Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Retrieved June 7, 2023.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ "DOE Backs Carbon Capture Development at Two Major Gas-Fired Power Plants". Power. September 1, 2023. Retrieved June 1, 2023.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ "Factbox: Emerging carbon capture projects at U.S. power plants". Reuters. March 12, 2023. Retrieved June 1, 2023.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ "The Toll from Coal: An Updated Assessment of Death and Disease from America's Dirtiest Energy Source," Clean Air Task Force, September 2010.
- ↑ "Technical Support Document for the Powerplant Impact Estimator Software Tool," Prepared for the Clean Air Task Force by Abt Associates, July 2010
Additional data
To access additional data, including interactive maps of the power stations, downloadable datasets, and summary data, please visit the Global Coal Plant Tracker and the Global Oil and Gas Plant Tracker on the Global Energy Monitor website.